A7HK2D North America, US, ME, Aerial. Porcupine Islands in Frenchman Bay.

Bangor Daily News Dec 30th, 2020

Protecting Maine’s coast

I am a young fisherman making my living for the last decade in Frenchman’s Bay. I recently attended a hearing by American Aquafarms, which is deceptive with its name for a starting point. The areas this Norwegian-backed company is proposing to turn into industrial aquaculture with two 50-plus acre leases for large fish pens, is heavily fished by lobstermen and has been for years. I am not a fan of foreign corporations making their money at the expense of Maine people.

I hope before anything moves forward, that the Department of Marine Resources denies this lease. We need to take a hard look at this company and all the large-scale aquaculture rules that have been put in place so that out-of-state and out-of-country interests don’t own one of Maine’s greatest treasurers: our coast.

Zach Piper


Week Of December 9th, 2020, Ellsworth American and MD Islander

Questions on aquaculture lease

Dear Editor:

Frenchman Bay sits at the foot of Acadia National Park. It is a beautiful and special place in Maine. Now it also is a targeted site for fin-fish in-water aquaculture, and there are so many questions that revolve around this potential lease, which would be owned by a company run by Norwegians. American Aquaculture, funded through European investors, wants to raise salmon. Those 66 million fish would be raised in a plastic polymer bag sitting in the ocean just north of Bar Harbor. Raising may be too generous a word; rather, the fish will be swimming in circles in containers in the water. The cold, clean waters of Maine get pumped in and water gets pumped out as the fish swim in circles. And that methodology leads to so many questions about the potential damage to the environment. What will the water pumped back into the bay be like? Will it affect our local marine animals and plants? Will the state have effective regulations in place to do no harm to the environment? How will the container be kept clean? How many jobs for locals will it really create? I ask that question as much of it is said to be handled remotely. Why this area of Maine — an area that attracts millions of visitors a year? Why would the state grant a lease to someone who has spent time in prison regarding investors and money issues? Whose interests are really being served?

Kathleen Rybarz


Communication 1/17/21

To: Friends of Frenchman Bay

From:  Steve Weber (resident of Hancock)

Re: Norwegian aquaculture project.


Like you, I am troubled about the plans by “American” Aquafarms to build a huge fish farming Operation in Frenchman Bay.

I was initially concerned that FFB’s response not be motivated by simple NIMBYism. One of the ways I addressed that issue for myself was to seek the advice of a Norwegian friend who is a recently-retired veterinarian with extensive experience in marine veterinary science. I asked him whether he believes that FFB’s concerns have any merit.

After the usual pleasantries he responded:

  “Concerning the gigantic plans on aquaculture in Frenchman’s Bay I would

 simply say: it is madness.

  So called closed systems i.e. canvas or plasic bags floating on sea sites were

 operated on experimental basis in Norway during late nineteen eighties and

 early nineties. Clean deep sea was pumped into the bags and waste water

 released from the bags together with biological waste. The systems never

 became profitable, and the systems I inspected eventually broke down or 

collapsed. As a principle such systems are very interesting because bacterial, 

viral infections and parasitic infestation can be reduced drastically. Such systems

 can be improved in order to remove biological waste from the sites. However,

 technically and practical it has turned out to be difficult and expensive.

  Dear Steve, please send my regards to Friends of Frenchman’s Bay and encourage

them to do what they can to protect the environment. I wonder where and how

the founders will find/raise money for a project of such size. And what about

the State of Maine’s environmental Authorities ?

  From your eternal friend…”  

I have a lot to learn about this project, but I have already learned enough to appreciate the threat it poses to our environment, our Bay, to local fisherman, and to Acadia National Park.

I have asked my Norwegian friend for more information. I will share it as/when it becomes available.


Steve Weber


Letter to the editor: Proposed ‘closed’ salmon pens pose threat to Frenchman Bay

I am writing to express opposition to the massive “closed” salmon pen operation proposed for Frenchman Bay.

American Aquafarms, based in Portland and organized recently by the Norwegian company Global AS, is proposing a gigantic salmon farm. Plans are to place 30 sea pens, each 150 feet wide, on two leases, totaling 100 acres in the center of the bay.

The American Aquafarms pens would support a projected annual production of 30,000 metric tons, or about 66 million pounds of fish.

I have been a summer resident of Mount Desert Island for 40 years. I spend much of my time there boating and picnicking on the surrounding waters and islands. Hop Island in Frenchman Bay is a favorite destination. One of the two American Aquafarms lease sites will be yards to the north of the Hop Island anchorage. This is an area daily plied by lobstermen, sailors and pleasure boaters.

The salmon pens on both lease sites will present an obstacle to such use. Their “closed” status will not prevent the release of dissolved fish and food waste into the surrounding waters, and farmed fish are likely to escape the pens.

Closed pens require significant electricity for the pumping of seawater. Power will be supplied by diesel generators for this operation, with attendant hazard.

There are no commercial-scale closed-pen systems operating in North America above pilot scale. In Norway the technology is still regarded as emergent. To pursue development of a massive system utilizing untried technology in the shadow of Acadia National Park is to invite disaster.

Francis M. Weld
Northeast Harbor


Frenchman Bay wrong site for salmon farm

American Aquafarms, a multimillion-dollar company, has applied to lease over 100 acres of the ocean for salmon farming in lucrative Frenchman Bay fishing grounds.

The proposed dual leases are to cover 50 and 60 acres on the ocean surface, but there is no telling how much additional space the pens will cover with ropes and anchors on prime fishing bottom. The 100-plus-foot barge that tends the expansive and invasive pens would hinder commercial fishing and possibly cut off gear as it travels.

As a local fisherman, I’m concerned about the livelihood of myself as well as others. These are rich lobstering grounds and the site is one of the worst possible areas for an industrial aquaculture company to set up shop. American Aquafarms portrays themselves as bringing many benefits to the local economy; in reality, their massive presence will bring minimal positive impacts and could harm a community that relies on smaller fishermen and local product.

Concern about space is not all we are worried about; salmon pens are notorious for leaking fish excrement, which can have devastating effects on lobsters, as well as other seafood harvested for a living. The pens could have long-lasting environmental effects that go beyond just the area right next to the salmon pens. Who knows how far the tides will carry excrement? All in all, the Department of Marine Resources owes it to Maine fishermen to take a closer look at the potential disasters these leases and pens could bring.

Josh Trundy


Letter to the Editor

Don’t Mess with Nature’s Masterpiece (EA Feb 3rd, 2021)

Dear Editor: As a small business owner and a regular small boat sailor in Frenchman Bay, I am writing to say I’m worried about the recent proposal to put sea pens in Frenchman Bay. My business depends on the national park, with unspoiled scenery of the ocean next to mountain peaks, miles of trails, trees and wildlife attracting millions of people to our Island. It would be the biggest salmon farm in the state, with 100 acres yielding 66 million pounds per year. The cruise ship industry will also be out there anchored, emitting their cancerous fumes directly into the ocean instead of out their smokestacks, a short distance from this farm. Millions of gallons of scrubber wash water are flushed out of a pipe in the bottom of the ship containing a whole slurry of carcinogenic PAHs. These are two industries that should not be working side by side and the reality is neither should be operating in Frenchman Bay. This applicant is presenting a huge experimental at sea fin-fish operation at a time when land-based farms are being demanded around the world, like the Belfast Bay salmon operation just down the coast. It is a similar size as the Frenchman Bay pens, in terms of fish produced, but it’s proposed to be built on land with a sewage treatment system cleaning the water. The view of the Porcupines in Frenchman Bay in Acadia National Park is iconic. It would be spoiled by dead industrial symmetrical forms laid on top of the exquisite natural asymmetry. Let us keep the 5,000 jobs that Acadia National Park already supports and not spoil what already works. Big industry does not belong superimposed on a billion dollar natural masterpiece. Jim O’Connell Bar Harbor

MD Islander. Viewpoint:

Saving Frenchman Bay (and published in Ellsworth American)

February 18, 2021 on Commentary, Opinion By Steve Weber

Poverty sucks! It literally diminishes our ability to be ourselves, to do the right thing. It compromises opportunities for education, for a healthy diet, for medical care, for employment, even for longevity. This should come as no surprise to us Mainers. At $55,602, our beloved state of Maine ranks 36th in per capita income. One of the consequences of our relative poverty is that we are more easily taken advantage of, more easily exploited.Over 40 years ago, when I was an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Maine, a student of mine asked if I would join a master’s committee to examine his thesis in agricultural economics. (What harm could a philosopher do?) As is so often the case in life, my intent to be helpful to someone else turned into an educational opportunity for me.The student had written a full-of-insights thesis comparing Maine’s economy with that of a third-world nation. Ours is largely an exploitive economy; an economy that extracts raw resources. We provide very little, job-producing “value added.” Instead, that potential is shipped elsewhere while we are left with depleted forests and seas. The latest figures show that Maine ranks 49th among the states in value-added per worker, trailing the U.S. average by 24 percent.Why would we let this happen? Because we are poor and desperate for any jobs we can get. Poverty forces us to take the low-percentage “bird-in-hand” rather than bide our time for better opportunities. While wealthier states can afford to resist the temptation of cheap exploitive jobs, we are consistently suckered into them. Why despoil the forests of Massachusetts or Connecticut if we can trash Maine instead?It is not just that we allow ourselves to be exploited by other states; foreign countries are getting in on the trashing of Maine. A case in point: Norway ranks third internationally with a per capita income of $82,500, (48 percent higher than Maine’s). Its wealth lets it take better care of its citizens, (free medical care, free higher education, paid parental leave, etc.) which, in a “virtuous circle,” produces more wealth. Norway’s wealth also allows its citizens to take better care of their environment (and hence reap long-term benefits).This explains how it is that a Norwegian business seeks to export its pollution to Maine in the form of an ocean-based, industrial-scale fish farm at the heart of our Frenchman Bay. Norway regulates fish farms far more rigorously than we do. Perhaps that is because it values its beautiful coastline more than we value ours. But a more likely explanation is our poverty and the lack of regulation it spawns. This Norwegian company proposes to exploit our clean, clear waters and Maine’s more lenient regulations. In Norway, a fish farm is allowed to produce up to 5,000 pounds of fish per year; in Maine we have no such limitation. The 100-acre, floating factory, (complete with a network of floating docks and two large barges moored near its pens), that these Norwegian investors propose will produce up to 66,000,000 pounds of fish per year. Is that a lot? Yes. It would be the equivalent of 13,200 of the maximum-sized fish farms allowed by Norwegian regulations. No wonder these Norwegian investors want to take advantage of us.All those years ago, when my student argued for a “value-added” economy, I thought to myself: Maine does have a value-added economy. It is tourism, where most of the jobs stay in state, where people come here, rather than sucking resources out. Why do they come? Primarily to enjoy our clean, beautiful environment. Over two million people come to visit Acadia National Park, (on whose doorstep these Norwegian investors propose to anchor this atrocity), every year. This Norwegian project not only exploits our poverty, it damages our most valuable resources, both economically and aesthetically.Some pleasures are open to us all regardless of income: for example, enjoying the view of Frenchman Bay from the top of Cadillac Mountain. Close your eyes; imagine that view you know so well: beautiful islands floating in a pristine bay. Now imagine looking out from the top of Cadillac to see 100 acres of fish pens. To put that in perspective, Bald Porcupine Island, which sits so beautifully in Frenchman Bay, is 32 acres; Burnt Porcupine Island is 40 acres; Sheep Porcupine is 22. Add them up: together they are less than the 100 acres this Norwegian fish farm envisions claiming for itself.I began this essay with the cliché, “poverty sucks.” I did not, however, say what it sucks.Poverty sucks human and natural potential. It condemns us to be less than we can be; to compromise our future; to be timid in our defense of our self and of Maine; to grasp at the (always false) promises of “hundreds of new jobs” while abandoning the (actual) hundreds of lobstermen, clammers, wormers, scallopers, etc. who depend on Frenchman Bay for their subsistence – not to mention the thousands of hoteliers, restauranters and guides who depend on Acadia National Park. Now our poverty even threatens to suck away that beautiful view of an unsullied Frenchman Bay.Poverty wears various faces. There is a proud poverty that works hard and waits for a break. There is an ugly poverty that tries to “get mine” at the expense of others. But then there is a stupid poverty that sells itself and its future to the lowest bidder.We might be poor, but we do not have to be stupid.

Steve Weber is a retired university president living in Hancock.

Below is OpEd BDN 3/19/21 by Renata Moise of Hancock


Week of 3/34, Ellsworth American and MDIslander

A worrisome future

Dear Editor: On March 16, I watched American Aquafarms present to the Bar Harbor Town Council its proposal for salmon farming in Frenchman Bay. Rather than convincing me to support the project, the company’s explanations conjured up a worrisome future.It’s a lovely day for sailing, and I’m tacking south from Sorrento Harbor toward Bald Rock. The ledge usually stands out against Mount Desert Island, but today all I see are bright-colored buoys, a large boat, what looks like buildings floating on water and a field of structures sitting low on the bay. I brace the tiller and peer through binoculars. There’s a man, looks like he’s walking on water between the structures.I’d really like to reach Green Can No. 9, which marks the turning point for this annual summer pilgrimage. I’m close enough to catch the man’s attention but he’s ignoring me, so I sail alongside the farm, passing a half-dozen round structures without getting to the end. The wind carries the low hum of machinery. Buoys continue on and who knows how far I’d sail before reaching clear water.The afternoon is late and soon the sea breeze will die. I have an outboard but hate to use it, so reluctantly I point my bow homeward toward Dram Island. I know what this is; I just didn’t realize the extent of its impact or thought it would be a visual eyesore and not an actual obstruction. This is the closed-pen fish farm where the aquaculture company with an American name but Norwegian owner proposed to grow salmon. I like to eat salmon. But as far as I know Frenchman Bay has no native salmon population. It has plenty of other local fisheries and hopefully always will have. It’s also one of the most beautiful places on earth. Iconic Acadia National Park overlooking the bay is called “One of the nation’s most beloved parks” by National Geographic and is among the top 10 most visited national parks with over 3.5 million visits per year.And it has people like me, who love to sail. We are all stakeholders.Ann Hoffner Sorrento

Letter to the Editor Ellsworth American 3/31/21

Dear Editor: It was very disturbing to read the article on March 11 about the proposed salmon farm in Frenchman Bay. It would be good to be very wary about this proposal. We have seen similar things in the past: A company approaches a town, making promises of lots of “local” job opportunities, sustainability, the highest environmental standards and new, improved technologies, but over time the community sees a trail of broken promises, water pollution and environmental deterioration.Frenchman Bay, adjacent to Acadia National Park, is home to beautiful clean waters, a thriving tourist industry consisting of whale watching boats, shore and wildlife watching boats, cruise ships, private sailboats, motorboats and kayakers, a seasonal ferry, as well as several dozen small-scale lobster, mussel, oyster and seaweed operations owned by private local fishermen and women operators. All these have a vested interest in keeping these waters sustainable and clean.The salmon farm operation would transform this area into an industrial area with large commercial vessels, described as “barges and other craft,” transporting the collected fish wastes, consisting of feces and food, as well as harvested salmon from the pens back to the mainland for continuation of the industrial aspect by transforming to biogas and fertilizer.The current “closed pen” “emergent technology” proposal touts processes that would allegedly address major challenges such as waste control, fish escapes, reducing sea lice infestation and high mortality and “reducing” antibiotic use.But fish farms have been notorious in the past for serious ecological problems such as diseased fish, escaping fish mixing with the wild native salmon population, antibiotic use in fish for treating infections, high mortality and sea lice. It would be good to remember that the proposal also includes, while initially consisting of two pens, the potential increase in the number of pens to adding 10 pens per year over several years.The CEO of the currently Norwegian owned company has in the past been convicted of multiple counts of fraud, spending four years in prison and paying restitution of more than $1 million. He confirmed the charges and stated he “made some promises he could not keep.” So why should Mainers believe or trust him now to keep his promises about the technology and for holding the beautiful waters of Frenchman Bay and the livelihoods of Mainers in his hands.Marie Zwicker Sullivan

BDN 4/12/21 Tom Bailey

Fish farm questions

Renata Moise’s March 18 OpEd in the BDN, “Industrial fish farms pose dangers to Frenchman Bay” raises important questions about American Aquaculture’s lease application for closed pen salmon farming in Frenchman Bay. The project’s massive scale is underscored by the word “industrial” in the piece’s title, and the applicant’s own detailed description of the project size and complexity.

Along with questionable promises about “emergent technology” preserving the bay from environmental effects, American Aquafarm’s principle promotional argument is economic. Certainly Maine has economic issues, yet tax bases of communities around the bay, tiny Sorrento where I live, Winter Harbor, Lamoine, Hancock, Trenton, Bar Harbor, are greatly assisted by summer and tourist populations. Their per-capita assessed value and tax base is much higher than for communities not on the bay. (See 2021 Business Overview from Mount Desert Islander and Ellsworth American.)

This is in addition to traditional small scale marine industries whose existence contributes greatly to the bay’s economic value both on its own and through added tourism. A principle economic driver of the Frenchman Bay region is recreation and tourism, certainly more than the few hundred jobs American Aquaculture would provide. Major project profits would go to international investors not the local economy even with multiplier effects.

The recreational and tourist industries have great multipliers in the local skilled trades and service economies of Hancock County. The industrial scale and scope of this project are in direct conflict with the economy and environment of Frenchman Bay.

Tom Bailey


EA letter 4/21/20

A bad deal for Maine

Dear Editor: An industrial-scale salmon farm is proposed for Frenchman Bay with the promise of new jobs and environmental stewardship. While this sounds attractive, let’s consider who stands to benefit, and who stands to lose, because, while Frenchman Bay may be good for salmon (and salmon investors), the salmon may not be good for the bay, nor for the community as a whole. The proposed technology is risky. It’s never been used for a project even close to this size. Nevertheless, the firm plans to raise 66 million pounds of fish annually over a 20-year period. That’s a lot of fish. If you piled it into a 7.5-acre area the size of the island closest to the farm, the Hop — a much beloved, often-visited, pristine jewel — the pile would be 26 feet above the Hop’s highest point. Once processed, fish will need to be trucked from the Gouldsboro plant. Consider: The weight limit for a standard, 53-foot semi-trailer is 43,000 pounds. With a cab, these trailers are 74 feet long. To haul 66 million pounds of fish, the proposed annual production, you’d need 1,534 trucks stretching 21 miles bumper to bumper. Skretting, an international supplier of commercial aquaculture fish food, indicates that it takes 1 pound of fish pellets to raise 1 pound of fish. That translates to another line of 1,534 trucks 21 miles long.There will be two 250-foot sludge barges, one at each pen. The sludge will be regularly towed ashore, dried (imagine the odor!) and trucked out for some other use — maybe fertilizer, they say. We don’t know exactly what the sludge volume is yet, but probably a similar volume to the food, so maybe another 21-mile line of trucks.There will be large transport logistics for diesel fuel required to power high-volume pumps, controls, lighting and crew quarters. This demand is so large it will require one and possibly two so-called “minor new source” emission licenses from the DEP to meet EPA air pollution regulations. Basically, a license to pollute in Maine, not Wyoming. All profit will leave Maine, and the U.S. In other words, they pay some low-wage salaries and pillage our spectacular pristine bay for the benefit of foreign investors and leave all of us with a depleted, polluted environment. As the old song goes, they get the mine; we get the shaft. The firm is unlikely to pay taxes to Gouldsboro, or even the state; they’ve always said they’re expecting tax breaks under the Maine Pine Tree Zone program. And don’t expect compensation for new roads in Gouldsboro, or even the over site costs borne by the already understaffed Maine Department of Marine Resources. Importantly, everyone — the whole bay community — would be harmed if these permits are granted: residents, property owners, visitors, taxpayers, lobstermen, shellfish and kelp farmers, wormers, the hospitality industry, the tourist economy, the outdoor recreation industry, hardworking independent locals, summer people, people who depend on the bay for their livelihoods, people who fish, recreate or otherwise enjoy the bay — and who doesn’t? We all stand to lose. A lot. This project will adversely affect everyone except its foreign developers and investors. It does not add up. It is likely to cost many more jobs than it could possibly add. It’s bad deal for Maine and should not be approved.

Henry Sharpe Sorrento

EA letter to editor 4/21/21

Devastating potential

Dear Editor: Questions of economic impact have been prevalent throughout this past year and it has made me think, what is the core of the Maine economy? The obvious answer is fishermen. The second, as shown by the former state motto “Vacationland,” is tourism. Despite individual fishermen’s opinions of tourists, lobstermen and “people from away” have a symbiotic relationship. Fishermen depend on the huge hauls and large sales of tourist season to earn enough to make it through heat season. Something that harms both the fishermen and tourists could be devastating to the local economy. It is for this reason I believe a salmon farm in Frenchman Bay would be devastating. Yes, it may bring short-term jobs, but we need to think long term.Fish farms are notorious for polluting our seas. Norway and other Scandinavian countries have strict ecological regulations, which is likely why the former Norwegian stockbroker jailed for investment fraud decided to come to Maine; our regulations are not as severe. Marine ecosystems are fragile, and disruption could be catastrophic for fishermen in the region. The proposed location of the thirty 150-foot pens would be right in the view of tourists ascending Cadillac Mountain. Seal watch boats would lose navigation space. Barges filled with fish would regularly round Schoodic Point, severely diminishing the natural beauty and appeal to visitors. If you care about the environment, you cannot support this. If you care about the economy, you cannot support this. If you care about our community heritage, you cannot support this.

Deiran Manning Gouldsboro

Ellsworth American 5/5/21

Not worth the cost

Dear Editor: As I learn more about the proposed salmon farm operation planned for Frenchman Bay and Prospect Harbor, I have many concerns.1) The scale of operation is out of character for the area, potentially interfering with other harbor uses including smaller aquaculture operations, fishing and lobstering and recreation.2) The fixed installations in Frenchman Bay will be unattractive located near Acadia National Park, with noise, fumes and lighting creating a nuisance to the bay and surrounding communities.3) Barge and ship traffic passing frequently between Prospect Harbor and Frenchman Bay will interfere with lobstering and adversely affect the Schoodic and Acadia experience for residents and visitors to the area.4) Water discharge in the quantities envisioned, even if “up to 90 percent clear,” could adversely affect the ecosystem in Frenchman Bay by altering water temperatures and adding nitrogen.5) There are unanswered questions regarding the use of large plastic holding pens, and how the plastic chemicals and potential breakdown into “microplastics” will affect the ecosystem of the bay.6) The proposed new salmon processing plant and associated structures and operations in Prospect Harbor raise potential issues with noise, light pollution and odor. Handling, storage and drying of sediment (fish droppings and food) could adversely affect the air quality of any location where that activity happens. An article in the Bangor Daily News describes the negative impact of a similar operation in Rockland [“The nose knows: How one Maine city gained new life by losing its stink, March 22, 2018]. All of this could negatively affect property values in the area.7) Our local roads are not able to handle current levels of heavy truck traffic; the planned transport of salmon and waste products will create an added burden on our local town’s infrastructure.This is not a “NIMBY” argument per se. Our “backyard” is owned and enjoyed by residents and taxpayers of Gouldsboro, Mount Desert Island and surrounding communities. Visitors to our area, who seek lodging, use our restaurants and experience Acadia National Park, are a key driver of the local economy. Over many years we have developed a workable balance among simultaneous uses of our area resources, whether commercial, recreational or ecological. The sheer scale of this proposed operation and its effect on other uses for the area, as well as its adverse environmental impact, should make it a non-starter. Although I support the goals of job creation, enlarging the local tax base and provision of high-quality food locally, the price of this project, as proposed, seems too high.

Mike Summerer Prospect Harbor

Ellsworth American 5/5/21

Don’t swallow the bait

Dear Editor: “Let’s get the record straight,” pleads Sebastian Belle, the executive director of the Maine Aquaculture Association. But the argument he sets out is far from straightforward. Try as he might to frame the controversy as “wealthy landowners” versus “the working waterfront,” preventing the industrialization of Maine’s coastal communities is about a lot more than the people opposing it.As a fourth-generation native of Winter Harbor, and the son of a woman who spent 17 years cutting heads and tails by hand in a sardine cannery, I don’t know a single fisherman or resident of this area who thinks largescale fin fish farms like the one proposed by a Norwegian group calling itself “American Aquafarms” is a good idea. And what about tourism? People come to our area to enjoy unspoiled waters, not to look at fish farms the size of football stadiums.Though Mr. Belle leads readers to suppose otherwise, no one opposed to American Aquafarms’ industrial-size proposal stands against small-scale or land-based independent fish farms. The question is simple: how much is too much?Perhaps the most persuasive notion he baits us with is that a proposal of this size might bring with it the potential of economic development. That empty promise will be sure to perk people’s ears. I’m not sure, however, we have been honestly informed on just what that “development” will look like. The proposed pens will operate at a fish stocking density that is nearly 10 times the maximum by which Norwegian regulations measure water quality. Currently, Maine has no such regulations.Why would we surrender Frenchman Bay to a foreign entity using unproven technology so far beyond what even Norway (the world salmon farming leader) allows? The idea that American Aquafarms is “eco-friendly” enough to operate on such an unprecedented scale strains reason. Are we actually willing to sacrifice our bay to their experiment? Become a cash cow for international corporations with no real ties and no lasting benefit to our communities?Though American Aquafarms has made quite clear the tidy profit it stands to make off our waters, what it hasn’t made clear at all is what our local communities stand to get out of it. Not much, in this Mainer’s opinion.

Chandler Williams Winter Harbor

Ellsworth American OP ED 5/12/21

By Jerilyn Bowers

Sebastian Belle is quick to lay blame on a “few wealthy landowners” for “attacking the many who make their living on the water.” While that scenario makes for good theater, it is simply a clever attempt to distract you from the facts.Let’s do as Mr. Belle suggests and “get the record straight” by reviewing the facts: Over the last 15 years, rules and regulations governing Maine’s aquaculture industry have been radically changed by:• Increasing the maximum number of acres that can be leased by an entity from 250 acres to 1,000.• Increasing the length of a lease from 10 years to 20.• Allowing the transfer of a lease from one entity to another without a public hearing.• There is no limit on the total number of leases that can be granted in a specific bay and no mechanism in place to assess the cumulative impact of these leases on water quality, navigation, fishing or the marine ecosystem.• There has been an exponential increase in lease applications over the last decade. In 2010, DMR approved 34 aquaculture lease sites.In 2020, it approved 216.• Currently, the Department of Marine Resources approves 95 percent of all applications, despite remaining chronically underfunded and understaffed.The unintended consequence of relaxing these regulations is ironic since it jeopardizes the very industry Mr. Belle claims to protect. But as he rightly points out, most of Maine’s aquaculture entities could not even be described as small businesses — they are microscopic, owner-operator farms. And yet, by easing aquaculture regulations, Maine has opened its doors to large corporate entities, inviting them to set up shop in our coastal communities and drowning out the voice of Maine’s independent sea farmers. Have we learned nothing from the “big-box store” phenomenon? As these industrial shellfish, kelp and finfish operations become more prevalent, output is sure to saturate the market, making it increasingly difficult for local, small-scale, family-owned or independent producers to compete, or even deliver product into the market.Furthermore, Mr. Belle fails to mention the concentration of power at the Department of Marine Resources. The statute grants thecommissioner sole authority to determine whether an application presents “unreasonable interference” to navigation, fishing or other uses, ecologically significant flora and fauna and public use or enjoyment. Yet it stops short of defining what constitues “unreasonable interference,” leaving it instead for the commissioner to determine. At the very least, the term must be clearly defined and quantifiable.At a recent public hearing DMR testifi ed that there was no need to review its policies, thus dismissing the opportunity for a statewide conversation to determine whether these policies meet the needs of Maine’s coastal communities. Although the DMR, members of the Legislature and Mr. Belle may not agree, the time for that conversation is now.It is worth underscoring that the state of Maine is duty-bound to uphold and manage our waters and submerged lands in perpetuity for the public trust, not for the financial interests of privately held companies or their investors.Mr. Belle claims that Maine’s aquaculture leasing and environmental monitoring laws are the gold standard. But this could not be further from the truth. In fact, countries such as Norway, Scotland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have more stringent aquaculture regulations than the United States and Maine — including mandated regional marine sustainability plans. A fact that has not gone unnoticed by the corporate entities seeking to establish operations in our waters.Aquaculture has tremendous potential for Maine, but we need to get it right. We are currently watching the implications of Maine’s regulatory changes, endorsed by the Maine Aquaculture Association, play out in real time. The pending proposal from American Aquafarms for two 60-acre salmon aquaculture lease sites in Frenchman Bay is a clear example of why tighter regulations are needed — not to harm Maine’s independent aquaculture industry, but to protect it.

Jerilyn Bowers is a seventh-generation native of Mount Desert Island and member of Friends of Eastern Bay, a stakeholder group working to ensure the health, beauty and historic accessibility of Eastern Bay and the waters surrounding Mount Desert Island. She lives in Hancock.

5/11/21. Bangor Daily letter to Editor

Oppose industrial aquaculture
I lobster out of Lamoine and Frenchman Bay is one of my greatest fishing areas. I don’t understand how we have gotten to the point in Maine where we would want large scale industrial aquaculture in rich fishing grounds. But here we are entertaining 30 pens containing salmon to be raised in the ocean.
This is about the scale of aquaculture and the type of aquaculture that is being proposed. I am dead set against this project and any large-scale aquaculture projects in Maine. I have been talking with Protect Maine’s Fishing Heritage Foundation and understand they support small aquaculturists, lobstermen and all those with a vested interest in the coast. They are also working hard to protect the ocean from industrial-scale aquaculture.
Why does the state seem to be so eager to sell our oceans? That’s what the state would be doing by granting all these aquaculture leases giving exclusive rights to some at the expense of others.
James McMillan


EA letter to editor 5/20/21

Ted O’Meara

“Public” meeting anything but

Dear Editor:

Last Thursday’s state-required “public informational meeting” by American Aquafarms was anything but public.We have all had to adjust to meeting by Zoom instead of in person, but in many ways that allows even more people to engage in public forums. Sadly, you never would have known that if you tried to participate in the meeting about AmericanAquafarms’ wastewater discharge permit applications for the pollutants that will flow from its massive industrial salmon farm in Frenchman Bay.Unlike any of the hundreds of Zoom meetings I’ve participated in over the last year or so, the gallery showing who else was at the meeting was turned off, the chat function was disabled and you couldn’t see the questions that people were waiting to ask. The company and its lawyers and consultants controlled every aspect of the meeting.When a questioner asked how many people were in the meeting, they said they didn’t know. If you have ever hosted a Zoom meeting, you know that’s simply not true. They knew; they just didn’t want us to know. And though we will never know who and how many people attended the meeting, it was clear that not a single person who was allowed to ask a question spoke favorably about the project.What also is abundantly clear is that American Aquafarms, which despite its name is really a Norwegian company funded entirely by Norwegian investors, does not believe in transparency and open dialogue. We are simply supposed to blindly accept empty reassurances about their motives, their faith in a technology that has never been used on a scale like this and their boilerplate modeling which lacks any real-world validation in waters like ours (but — surprise, surprise — shows that no harm will be done to the bay).Had I been called on to ask a question, mine would have been a very simple one: Why don’t you just pack up and leave now? You are not welcome here and people from all walks of life, from all around the bay are united as never before in making sure that this place we all cherish will not be destroyed by your greed and your destructive, ill-conceived proposal.

Ted O’Meara Hancock and Yarmouth

EA patlak letter to editor 6/10/21Salmon farm not worth the costDear Editor: Downeast Maine has always been a natural refuge from Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and other cities I have lived in and their nearby hotel-and-boardwalk-lined beaches. One of the last vestiges of a wild and unpolluted world left on the Eastern Seaboard, Frenchman and other nearby bays abutting Acadia National Park have remained clear and swimmable, still clothed in their unique awe-inspiring natural beauty replete with rocky shores fringed by forests and mountains, and magical islands that only surface with the tides. Like me, millions of people visit or summer in this vacationland each year. This brings Downeast Maine a sizable portion of its revenue, while restoring the spirits of those who visit its quiet and timeless environmental sanctuary.But that may soon change if the American Aquafarms proposal for a large-scale salmon farm is approved by state and federal officials. This operation is expected to discharge 4 billion of gallons of wastewater daily into the Frenchman Bay from each of its 15 pens — about 2,000 times the amount of effluent from Bar Harbor’s waste treatment plant. The 40 generators needed to run this operation are expected to be exceptionally noisy, along with the boats frequently ferrying the salmon to a processing plant in Prospect Harbor. In addition, lighting for 30 of the pens will mar the star-studded darkness for which nearby Acadia Park and its annual Night Sky Festival is known.I value economic development in Maine, but not if it will cost what makes the state valuable to most of the people who live or visit there — pristine waters supporting recreational boating and lobster, oyster and mussel fishing, a quiet peaceful environment restorative to the soul and a place full of unperturbed natural wonders. I urge all of us to do what we can to oppose this salmon fishing endeavor and the damage it will wreak in one of the most beautiful places in the world.Margie Patlak Corea and Philadelphia, Pa.

Ellsworth American letter to editor 5/27

A better option

Dear Editor:

The proposal by American Aquafarms to build salmon pens in Frenchman Bay [WaterfrontNews, May 18] threatens to mar one of the most beautiful marine settings in all of North America, where boaters and kayakers take inspiration from open waters surrounded by the bold headlands of Acadia National Park. Particularly dubious is the claim this project will bring a “next-generation, ecofriendly technology.” In fact, a far better salmon system is being operated by a company named AquaBounty, which currently farms the fish in circulating tanks on dry land, on Prince Edward Island and in Indiana. Each individual salmon reaches a market weight sooner, requires less feed and produces less waste.

Robert Paarlberg, Corea

Ellsworth American

letter to editor

Stone 6/17/21 .

Dear Editor:

Ellsworth American writer Letitia Baldwin covered the well-fed gathering with Norwaybased “American” Aquaculture in Gouldsboro. Oddly, no “farmed” salmon was offered. Baldwin observed and reported on an interaction I had with their sole American representative, Tom Brennan. Mr. Brennan was besieged with criticism and anger that day, so he was relieved that I asked him if he personally cared about the environment. He said yes and dashed away from a ring of critics to get me “his card.”Mr. Brennan voiced interest in opening communication with his Norwegian bosses regarding environmental sustainability. My proposal to them is that we all invest in habitat restoration in Maine waters. Frenchman Bay can be the first “test plot.”I propose that Norwegian “American” Aquafarms spend the $250 million required for a “semi-closed” industrial fish factory on instead beginning habitat restoration in Frenchman Bay. People used to fish for flounder right off local docks. Why not spend your millions on paying local scientists and divers to restore natural habitat for marine life? When edible stocks rebound, you would be first in line for harvest permits. No? That will not work for you? Theprofit will not come soon enough for “investors”? What are your priorities again? If your top priority is profit, why not build these fish factories in Norway? What? You are currently unable to do this project in Norway so you came here? It is not “sustainable” to burn fuel to get the fish from Norway to U.S. urban markets, so you want to run diesel generators and large ships in Frenchman Bay instead? If that is the case, maybe the state of Maine should deny the permit for an industrial fish factory in Frenchman Bay, or any other location in the state. Then we can get to work creating a viable, locally led and driven ocean habitat restoration plan that will benefit us all.That is my initial proposal. Clearly it needs refinement, and I hope that we will work together to create and implement a plan to rebuild our marine ecosystems, for the good of us all, not just to line the pockets of a multinational corporation.

Lynn Stone Sorrento

Editorial ran in MD Islander 6/16 and 6/17 2021 (Too much to lose) & EA, with different titles.

Editorials:The Next Big Thing

More than a few first-time visitors to Bar Harbor have nearly swerved off the road after glimpsing Frenchman Bay out the driver’s side window. A vast expanse of silver blue sea interrupted by the emerald-green mounds of the Porcupine Islands, it is a postcard come to life. Add a tall-masted schooner to the scene, and you will have our seasonal guests diving for their Nikons. For all its peacefulness, the bay is a humming ecological and economic engine. It is home to seals, seabirds, porpoises, fish and shellfish, including Maine’s iconic lobster. Fishing vessels, pleasure craft, tour boats and cruise ships ply the waters. Small-scale aquaculturists raise kelp, scallops and mussels. It is against this backdrop that the patriotically named but Norwegianbacked American Aquafarms proposes raising 30,000 tons of salmon in pens at two 60-acre sites located near Bald Rock and Long Porcupine Island. If successful, Hancock County could become the farm-raised salmon capital of the U.S., especially considering Whole Oceans’ plans for a landbased salmon operation in Bucksport. The Maine Fair Trade plant in Gouldsboro would find new life as a hatchery and salmon processing plant, bringing new jobs to a town that could use them.The developers say their system addresses the pitfalls of other pen operations by controlling and treating waste and preventing escapes. And, according to the lease application, American Aquafarms intends to use antibiotics only as a fallback plan, instead relying on the natural setting and vaccinations to protect the fish fromdisease. Some of the details in the proposal seem downright space-age, including the illustration of a stateof- the-art control room and a netcleaning robot. The robot, described as “novel,” may be an appropriate metaphor for the whole project: cool if it works, but there could be a lot of bugs to work out.The company says it intends to put about $300 million into the salmon farm. It will likely attract investors looking for the next big thing, but what happens if those investors cut bait and move on to the next big thing? Nothing comparable has been done on the Maine coast. It will take an enormous commitment of resources and leadership for the company to deliver on its promises — if it can.The state must look to its natural resources for new innovation, but that cannot come at the cost of proven assets. “Not in my backyard” is a tired argument, but there are very real concerns about the environment, the loss of prime fishing grounds and increased boat traffic.Members of the aquaculture industry testified against recent legislation aimed at revisiting the Department of Marine Resources’ lease process. They emphasized that the current process is thorough and sufficient to protect Maine’s waters and the many interests there. In our experience it has been. Let’s hope that continues to be the case. Because when it comes to Frenchman Bay, there is just too much to lose.Copyright (c)2021 Ellsworth American, Edition 6/17/2021

Ellsworth American Letter to the Editor 6/24/21

Murphy Treasured Resource in Danger

Dear Editor: We are opposed to the proposed construction in Frenchman Bay of two salmon farms by American Aquafarms and understand that on June 9, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection accepted American Aquafarms’ wastewater discharge application as complete.This company would profit from exploiting a treasured natural resource that should be protected for future generations.American Aquafarms’ potential 20-year lease on local waters would negatively affect the livelihoods of individuals who currently fish the areas of the proposed farms and interrupt the visual expanse of open ocean water treasured by those who live, work and visit the greater Bar Harbor area. In addition, it would cause pollution (light, noise and fuel) at unacceptable levels.This internationally owned company must be stopped from entering local waters and disrupting a fragile aquaculture system. If allowed to go forward, we fear it may invite other similar projects to area waters.Suzanne and Ted Murphy

Winter Harbor


Ellsworth American Letter to Editor

Wrong project, wrong place

Dear Editor: I am writing to urge public opposition to the application by American Aquafarms that is currently under review. This project will bring industrial- scale salmon pens to Frenchman Bay. This bay has been used and enjoyed by people for generations for fishing, pleasure boating, tourists and people who simply like to experience the exceptional Maine vitality of a healthy open bay surrounded by mountains, communities and a national park.In my opinion, a single entity should not have the right to impose a project that will forever affect the experiences of all the surrounding communities until and unless they have received overwhelming approval from all the people this project will affect. No one can own Frenchman Bay and everyone owns it. It is an issue of the commons vs. a private industrial enterprise. When a private enterprise seeks to impose its development on a territory that affects everyone, it needs the consent of all.It is not about the concept of aquaculture. It is about the scale of this single proposal. I realize there is no clear definition of “how much is too much.” But I firmly believe that if you ask everyone who has an interest in Frenchman Bay, you would get near unanimous agreement that the scale of this project is way too large for our bay.If you want to help stop this project, I urge you to involve your friends and neighbors who would have an interest in saving Frenchman Bay. There is abundant information available online. Here are a few: https://friendsoff renchmanbay.org and https://www. facebook.com/salmonproposal.

Dick Fisher Prospect Harbor

letter to editor 7/1/21

Ellsworth American

The future of Frenchman Bay

Dear Editor: It is obvious that the water quality of Frenchman Bay is of critical importance to all living species in and around its boundaries — marine life, terrestrial wildlife, residents, visitors and businesses alike.To that end, the state of Maine has established standards and limits that describe when water quality has been compromised. All aquaculture lease applications must describe in detail if discharges are expected to impact water quality along certain dimensions established by the state.Not all leases are created equal relative to their impact on water quality. In particular, the American Aquafarms application makes it clear that water quality will suffer during its operation. They do note, however, that in their opinion, the degradation of quality is not sufficient to exceed the maximum levels established by the state.Given that all the discharge data in this application are estimated, not actual, and estimated in an ideal environment, not by actual field studies on an operation of such massive scale, how certain can the state be that quality will not be degraded more than American Aquafarms estimates? It is possible that the actual degradation from this applicant could even exceed the maximum limits established by the state. The risk of error could be significant, resulting in irreversible harm.Given that the state believes the Frenchman Bay can absorb only so much degradation without serious systemic consequences, is the massive American Aquafarms proposal the best way to use so much of that remaining margin? Or could that remaining margin better support many less harmful applications?Further, should Mainers be given preference when limited Maine resources are at stake? Should tax credits be reserved for those projects that will not cause the level of harm that the American Aquafarms is proposing? And finally, will the few jobs created by the American Aquafarms proposal really be a fair exchange for permanently degraded water quality?

Roy Gruver, Prospect Harbor

Viewpoint: Let’s trust Yankee common sense 

July 13, 2021 on CommentaryOpinion (MDIsander 7/14/21)

By Nicola Knipe and Karl Kusserow 

As Maine taxpayers for more than 30 years, we believe in protecting the state’s pristine waters and parklands and supporting industries that bring good jobs to Mainers. The proposed American Aquafarms project in Frenchman Bay will do neither. American Aquafarms will industrialize and may ruin one of the most beautiful recreation spots on the Eastern Seaboard and thereby cost far more jobs in the local tourism and hospitality industries – 5,000 jobs and over $500 million in 2019 – than they may create. Tourism revenue enriches Maine. By contrast, American Aquafarms will enrich no one but themselves – and the lawyers and businesspeople currently on their payroll, working to get permits so the project can roll ahead.  

Let’s get our facts straight:  

Despite its name and red, white and blue eagle logo, American Aquafarms is not American. It is Norwegian – as are the four other major aquaculture projects proposed in coastal Maine. Why? Because Maine does not yet have the stringent environmental regulations that Norway does to protect water quality, biosecurity and the livelihoods of smaller fishing industry operators. These foreign investors propose to make a fast profit here, farming fish at a scale that won’t pass muster in their own country. 

Furthermore, American Aquafarms claims to be sustainable, but has not, in fact, carried out an environmental impact assessment for what will be the largest ocean fish farm in North America. They admit the technology has never been used at this scale. How will four billion gallons of discharge a day affect Frenchman Bay? How will 10 diesel generators at ocean level, each big enough to power a city hospital, spewing emissions directly above the water surface, affect the quality of air and water? Nobody knows. We will be the guinea pigs for a project whose leaders live 3,000 miles away. If it destroys a marine ecosystem already seriously threatened by climate change, they do not have to live with the consequences. We do. 

Finally, American Aquafarms claims that by raising salmon in Maine they are reducing the carbon footprint of transporting the fish from Norway to the U.S. What they are actually doing is outsourcing their carbon footprint – to Maine. The 66 million pounds of salmon they intend to produce will not be eaten in Maine but transported by refrigerated tractor trailers to Boston. An estimated one truck to or from Gouldsboro every 16 minutes will be needed to supply, transport and run their vast operation. Mainers will suffer the brunt of the pollution, the increased land and water traffic, and the loss of one of the last great places as yet untouched by massive industrialization. 

Maine has incredible potential for aquaculture. But let’s do it right! There are tested, sustainable, bio-secure and renewably powered options that could bring jobs up and down the coast. Let’s trust Yankee common sense and ingenuity, not an untested proposal that could destroy one of the region’s most important and glorious assets. 

For more information, this is a great resource: frenchmanbayunited.org

Nicola Knipe and Karl Kusserow reside in Princeton, N.J. 

MDIslander 7/14/21

To the Editor:

The Bar Harbor Chamber of Commerce represents nearly 400 businesses in Bar Harbor and its surrounding areas. The majority of our member businesses are in the hospitality industry and rely on visitors to our area to support their livelihoods. For this reason, and more, the Chamber opposes the draft aquaculture lease applications submitted by American Aquafarms Inc.It is unusual for a Chamber of Commerce to oppose a project that promises to bring jobs and business activity to its region, but the proposed industrial salmon farms threaten the brand we have cultivated to attract and retain visitors. Those visitors have been coming to Bar Harbor and Acadia National Park for more than 100 years to enjoy the pristine views of Frenchman Bay from the rugged coastline of Mount Desert Island. American Aquafarms’ proposed aquaculture leases would detract from the scenic beauty of our area and imperil the existing tourism economy that provides jobs to more than 4,300 people and generates thousands of tax dollars for the state of Maine.The industrial scope of the proposed salmon farms is far too large for our harbor. Visually, the oversized salmon farms would blight the views from Acadia National Park’s peaks, motor roads and carriage roads, as well as from the decks of boats carrying sightseers.The Chamber also stands with our local fishermen and women who are a vital component of our business community. They have expressed concerns about the salmon farms cluttering the bay and impacting its resources. The potential for water pollution from discharge systems, feed, and waste could jeopardize Frenchman Bay and its wildlife. The ship traffic servicing the salmon farms may also result in additional loss of fishing gear.Our communities, both here in Bar Harbor and in our fellow towns around Frenchman Bay, have voiced their concerns about this project as well. Industrial-sized salmon farms are not appropriate for our region.Maine’s nickname “Vacationland” makes clear that tourism is of the utmost importance to our way of life. And while I can appreciate leaders in Augusta looking for ways to diversify our economy with aquaculture projects, this proposal from American Aquafarms simply does not fit in one of Vacationland’s most visited places.

Alf Anderson Executive Director Bar Harbor Chamber of Commerce

Ellswoth American

Portland Press Herald


Letter to the editor: American Aquafarms will usher in environmental degradationRecently, Gouldsboro selectmen got an earful about the American Aquafarms project. I have been a lobsterman most of my life and I really don’t like to speak in public. But as I told my wife that night before the meeting, I am going to have to say something, or I will regret it for the rest of my life.I can just imagine what the American Aquafarms project will do to Frenchman Bay. Look at the environmental issues that are already well known when you try to grow large amounts of salmon in a small area: escapes, genetically produced fish, concentrated feces and the devastation these bring to the surrounding environment.The environmental degradation is significant. You can add in the noise of the pumps that will be running 24/7 and the lights.Here is an example of impact that you won’t hear American Aquafarms talk about: When my gaff smacks the deck, what do you think happens? Everything scatters in the water. Now picture that going on 24 hours a day with the sound of pumps.Net pen salmon have no place in Frenchman Bay and, frankly, no place in Maine. This has to stop. I am asking Maine not to sell our oceans.

Jerry Potter, Gouldsboro

MDIslander 8/5/21, Letter to editor.

Just say no to salmon farm

To the Editor: The American Aquafarms (AA) Frenchman Bay project proposal is the wrong proposal in the wrong place at the wrong time. The industrial- sized farm will produce 66 million pounds of salmon per year, create 60-80 jobs and place $100 per acre into state coffers, but at what cost? This project shouts CLIMATE CHANGE in the size of its carbon footprint (a calculation not required of AA) and environmental damage with multiple forms of pollution.The energy required by this “floating feed lot” requires ten 500Kw 750HP diesel generators running 24/7 at 90 percent capacity. This will require 7,000 gallons of diesel per day, basically one tanker-truck delivery each day. Sixty-six percent of the BTUs from this fuel is expelled into the atmosphere. Add to this the exhaust pollutants: carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, particulates and hydrocarbons. There are also 30 backup generators, not necessarily running but full of fuel and crankcase oil, ready to spill.AA is not even required to scientifically quantify, model or demonstrate the noise level produced by this cacophony of sources, or the distance traveled over open water and echoing off the rocky shores.The water pollution, a result of all fluid wastes and 10 percent of the solid waste containing phosphorus, ammonia and dissolved CO2 being discharged untreated directly into the bay (this is permitted). Ninety percent of the solids are treated by “dewatering,” compressed to expel any fluid which is also discharged into the bay. The remaining solids are incinerated on shore.With pen structures 13 feet above the water, lighting of the structures, and 540 underwater fixtures lighting up the 30 pens at night, this industrial farm will scenically impact Frenchman Bay.This will all take place in one of the least developed, most pristine bays on the coast of Maine within sight of the crown jewel of National Parks. Practically every island in the bay is either part of Acadia National Park or has a conservation easement on it by one of the many environmental conservation nonprofit groups.Wrong proposal, wrong place, wrong time.

David Seaton, South Gouldsboro

8/11/21 letter to Editor

It’s time for our government to listen

Dear Editor: As a seasonal resident of Winter Harbor for 48 years, I have followed the news of American Aquafarms with great interest and concern. There are so many things wrong with what this company is trying to do — for the benefit a few foreign investors at the cost of the local citizenry.American Aquafarms is proposing to install fish pens at two 60-acre sites in Frenchman Bay. It hopes to raise as much as 66 million pounds of Atlantic salmon annuallyThe two sites would draw and discharge 2 billion gallons of water daily.Each fish pen site would require generators that will create noise pollution and light that will create light pollution, not to mention the large barges that will transport fuel, fish and fish excrement.The truth is that American Aquafarms does not know what impact these pens will have on the lobster fishing industry and other natural resources.Around the world, the number of coastal communities questioning this type of salmon farming is growing steadily. Argentina has banned this industry outright. Norway has not approved a plan of this scale in that country, which is why they are trying to do it in Maine.American Aquafarms has yet to seriously consider the concerns of the affected communities. The public sessions to discuss the plans have allowed limited questions and answers, and the company’s promised answers are not forthcoming.Jobs are promised, but no one has answered the question of what jobs, how many and who would fill them. Unknown and unanswered are how many existing jobs would be lost or threatened?In 2008, Mikael Roenes, the CEO of American Aquafarms, went to jail for perpetrating one of the largest business frauds in Norway’s history. Are we to trust him with our fishing industry and natural resources?Although American Aquafarms is seeking permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the state of Maine, this is primarily a local issue and must be treated that way.Fortunately, the Gouldsboro selectmen have publicly committed to fulfill their statutory responsibilities to protect the health, safety and well-being of their citizens. The selectmen recently voted unanimously to insist that American Aquafarms submit a site plan and fund an independent assessment of the potential impacts.This courageous commitment of responsible stewardship by the Gouldsboro selectmen is a step in the right direction.

Susan Bruce, Winter Harbor

Ellsworth American


Commentary An open letter to the American Aquafarms CEO

By Ann Michelson Hirschhorn

Dear Mr. Roenes: Your company, American Aquafarms, is applying to the Maine Department of Marine Resources (DMR) to lease two 60-acre sites in the middle of Frenchman Bay. You plan to build 30 huge floating pens to raise 66 million pounds of farmed salmon annually. This represents the first step in industrialization of a bay that is currently in good economic balance between tourism, lobstering, shellfish and sea vegetable aquaculture, clamming, worming, recreational boaters, coastal businesses and other small-scale activities.From your commentary in the Ellsworth American of July 29, it appears that you think you are bringing us the gift of newly developed, improved technology that will set a standard for in-water fin fish aquaculture in the United States. You seem to think that gives you the right to choose the site most appropriate to your needs without any consideration of the current status and needs of the site; of the people who came before, who live there now and who will live there in the future; of the flora and fauna that flourish there or the established customs and practices of those who currently make a living and/or recreate in the bay.You have heard the outpouring of opposition, the communal horror at the thought of your project. Last March, I warned you of it in a letter to which you did not reply. Is your commentary finally the answer to that letter? If so, the answer appears to show your ongoing refusal to recognize the significance of the history, culture and character of our bay, its surrounding islands and the national park. It reiterates your disrespect for the generations who have worked and continue to work to preserve this bay as the pristine natural wonder, the unique natural resource and the treasured home it is for this and generations to come.You claim to be eco-friendly, dedicated to sustainability, community-minded. Yet you are designing your application solely to comply with the current DMR rules and regulations, which were developed for local, small-scale, light commercial installations. The DMR has never before been asked to evaluate an in-water industrial application of this size and capacity. In addition, you bring us a technology that has not been commercially validated. It is only just now being piloted, at one site in Norway and another in Canada, with single pens and a shorter portion of the life cycle of the fish.How can you have the audacity to ask to do an experiment at this scale here when it would not be allowed in your heavily regulated Norwegian waters? Do you think so little of the state of Maine, its government and its citizens to presume that we would allow you to do this in waters that are owned by the state in trust for the public? Where is your proclaimed respect for the community and its environment when you propose to pollute its waters, defile the iconic views, the peaceful soundscape and the world-renowned night sky of one of our nation’s treasured national parks?We appreciate that you ask us to work with you to modify your plans in response to our concerns. However, there is nothing you can do to modify the fact that what you are proposing is inappropriate and dangerous development for this bay.As you must be aware, any business venture can fail. If you succeed, you and your Norwegian investors will profit handsomely. If you fail — through accident, disaster, poor design, lack of funding — you can walk away and start again. We, on the other hand, risk everything whether you succeed or fail: our livelihoods, our quality of life, our heritage, the irreversible destruction of a place of natural beauty and bounty that our forebears and we have strived for generations to preserve in perpetuity. We cannot afford to risk your success or your failure.Mr. Roenes, please know that you have awakened a sleeping giant. Industrial scale aquaculture does not belong in Frenchman Bay. We, the opposition, from all walks of life and all parts of the country, refuse to base our existential survival solely on the “hope” that once again the system will work. We will not rest until our sacred place is secured.Ann Michelson Hirschhorn is a retired neurologist whose family has owned a home on Hancock Point for nearly 80 years and through four generations. Since 2017, she has worked with Friends of Frenchman Bay, whose mission is the protection and preservation of Frenchman Bay.Copyright (c)2021 Ellsworth American, Edition 8/12/202


Ellsworth American LTE 9/9/21

Historic day on the bay

Dear Editor: Sunday, Aug. 29, was a historic day on Frenchman Bay. Close to 125 boats representing the lobster industry, local aquaculturalists, recreational boaters, conservationists and environmentalists chugged their way from local harbors to join the protest “Save the Bay Flotilla.” The cause was to bring attentionabout the industrialized fish pen operation that Norwegian-based American Aquafarms is proposing to the State of Maine through the Department of Marine Resources for licensing of what will be considered the largest salmon fish farm anywhere in the United States. Each boat that participated, along with hundreds of passengers on the respective vessels, resoundingly expressed their opposition to the proposed salmon operation.As the brainchild and general organizer of the event, the responsible nautical stewardship by each boat operator reflected the safety, respect and overall goodwill about each participant’s relationship with our beloved Frenchman Bay. There is no question that the protest was a major success, and I personally thank each boat operator, the VHF radio operator, passengers, homemade banner makers, drone operators, bagpipers, Bar Harbor harbormaster and everyone else for making this dream come true. Street activism, or in this case waterfront protests, are alive and well. And will continue to be as long as this project continues to show its scary face in Maine.The synergy of tourism, lobstering, owner-independent aquaculture and recreational boating works beautifully on Frenchman Bay. A proposal of this magnitude threatens all of that. As Jacques Cousteau said, “People protect what they love.” Which, incidentally, was a banner flying on a Sorrento lobsterman’s boat. Take that American Aquafarms! We will continue to protect what we love!

Leslie Harlow Ellsworth

Ellsworth American LTE, 9/24/21

The true enemies in Frenchman Bay

Dear Editor: The enlivening qualities of the Downeast spirit are self-reliance, sheer determination, fortitude, grit and an abiding hope bordering on assuredness. This moment finds the Downeast spirit in a struggle for its very existence.The very notion of entertaining a fish farm, the kind of “thing” shunned above all else, betrays the severity of disease. I encourage all to take down their signs and sweep away the battle lines from the sand. Your neighbor is not the enemy. The folks from away are not the enemy and the folks from far, far away are not the enemy. Our enemies are hopelessness, helplessness and an overwhelming sense of “aloneness.” If we are to survive, not just as a people but a certain kind of people — capable people, strong people, kind people, gentle people — we need to ask our neighbor, “How may I help?” then listen with great intent and when alone consider our contribution to the crisis.The solutions to our problems — the dying of a way of being, a way of life — flow from within the communities around the bay. The solution is not the injection of foreign capital. It is the investment in our own home-grown human capital with a sense and sensibility of our past with an eye on an evergrowing harmonious future. Let not the dazzle of easy coin blind us to one another and the gifts, creativity, observations, deep feelings and capabilities all may bring to bear to solve this crisis. It is community we are losing and must reclaim. Gratitude to those proposing the project, for they have shone the light on the darkness revealing a dying body and thus catapulting us to wakefulness and into DEFCON 1. The bay is sacred. We all must shift our thinking, our perceptions, holding all tenderly and allowing for growth, whilst contemplating harmony.

Laurie Plummer Simpson Sullivan and Woolwich

Ellsworth American 9/23/21 (Op Ed)

A Commentary Defending Acadia against industrial-scale aquaculture

By David MacDonald

For more than a century, landowners, community members and park partners have worked together to preserve the lands and waters that define Acadia National Park. We are blessed by their foresight, and we experience their gifts daily — dramatic coastal scenery, clean drinking water, recreation on the historic trails and carriage roads, dark night skies and the opportunity to restore ourselves in nature.Acadia’s founders would likely have a lot to say about the proposal from American Aquafarms to construct two 60-acre salmon farms near Bald Rock and Long Porcupine Island in Frenchman Bay. At approximately the size of 15 football fields, the farms would be an industrial use at unprecedented scale and reliant on unproven technology. They would permanently degrade the park’s scenic vistas, clean air, natural soundscapes and visitor experience.American Aquafarms proposes to raise 66 million pounds of salmon each year at full build-out, contributing significant amounts of new nutrient pollution to the bay. Each farm would have five diesel-powered 500kw generators running continuously to keep water flushing through the pens — up to 6,200 Olympic-sized swimming pools of water being pumped through each site daily. The threat of massive industry in the center of the Acadian archipelago is precisely why park founders worked tirelessly to protect the lands of Acadia for future generations to enjoy.The nationally significant gift of Acadia will be tarnished if American Aquafarms’ salmon farms are permitted. The pens and associated barges and infrastructure would be highly visible from Acadia’s hiking trails, carriage roads and Park Loop Road, as well as from the Cadillac Summit Road, which are all on the National Register of Historic Places. The world-class recreational experience enjoyed by kayakers and boaters on the waters and conserved islands in Frenchman Bay would be greatly diminished.It is not only scenic viewsheds and soundscapes at risk. Acadia is a Class 1 area under the Clean Air Act, meaning the park is designated to receive the highest level of protection against air pollution and haze.All of these designations are a testament to the special nature of Acadia National Park and Frenchman Bay. Together they help make this region an economic powerhouse, with the draw of the park contributing over $511 million to the economy and supporting more than 5,400 jobs.On Aug. 29, a flotilla of 120 fishing vessels and recreational boats from neighboring harbors around Frenchman Bay gathered to illustrate the massive scale of the proposed lease site near Long Porcupine Island and to demonstrate the overwhelming local sentiment against the salmon farms.This is not about opposing aquaculture as an industry. Frenchman Bay has a long history of small-scale aquaculture operations that live in harmony with traditional uses of the bay, such as lobstering, recreational boating and tourism. Adding two 60-acre permanently fixed salmon farms within a bay that means so much to so many, however, would surely destroy these longstanding traditions of living in balance with each other and the bay, stewarding the natural resource and supporting strong local livelihoods.The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Maine Departments of Marine Resources and Environmental Protection face a weighty permitting decision that will affect Acadia’s scenic vistas, clean air and natural soundscapes for the 20-year permitted span of the leases, and potentially beyond if the farms are established, licenses later renewed and potentially expanded.Friends of Acadia will be working alongside the National Park Service, the National Parks and Conservation Association, Frenchman Bay United and the many other local stakeholders that will be urging these agencies to deny American Aquafarms the permits needed to operate in Frenchman Bay. We owe it to all of those who worked so hard before us and all of those who will follow in future years when places like Frenchman Bay will be that much more rare, valuable and treasured by all.

David MacDonald is president and CEO of Friends of Acadia.Copyright (c)2021 Ellsworth American, Edition 9/23/2021

Ellsworth American 9/23/21 LTE

What if?

Dear Editor: What if American Aquafarms didn’t come to town, like a giant, fouling our precious bay and crushing the livelihoods of our self-employed, small-scale, independent fisheries?What if our precious bay remained as it is, a home to the animals that live within it, like the harbor porpoise and minke whale that rise from a deep pool behind a tiny island. And the clear, clean water continued to touch every grain of sand and granite rock that surround it. That wading birds stood in marshy grass and listened to only the wind.What if the Maine Fair Trade factory, now empty and silent on the shore of Prospect Harbor, became a fertile ground for small-scale aquaculture, where young folks could plant an idea and watch it grow, nurtured by the generosity of others. A place to cultivate the dreams and desires of these young and hopeful youth. A place to harvest not only their catch, their crop, but for all of us to gather and enjoy the bounty of the sea, the bounty of a generous community.What if wishes really did come true?

Letter to DEP

Dear Ms. Dionne:

As a Maine taxpayer and a long-time seasonal resident of Hancock Point on Frenchman Bay, I wish to comment on American Aquafarms’ applications for Waste Discharge Licenses.

1. Generally. A project of this size, in an environment this sensitive, with a principal investor this shady, demands that the Department of Environmental Protection rely exclusively on the best available scientific evidence in determining whether the regulatory criteria for the licenses have been satisfied. Good administrative practice, not to mention the Maine Administrative Procedure Act, requires nothing less. Certainly the rosy scenario painted by American Aquafarms in its applications should not be taken at face value for the following reasons, among others:

2. The flow modeling is inadequate. It should be clear at the outset that the Cormix model for water flow cannot apply in Frenchman Bay, where the tides – unlike a river — do not move in only one direction. In fact, on its website, the company behind the Cormix model explicitly excludes applications in areas with dynamic tidal flux, like Frenchman Bay. The fact is that the unprecedented amount of effluent from this operation will not be washed away and dissipated with the tide. I may not be an environmental scientist, but I know from my own experience on the Bay for the last fifty years that what the tide takes out, the tide brings back in. My concern is that the waste discharge from these pens will recirculate and concentrate steadily over time until the Bay – not to mention the Class SA waters off Schoodic Point and Otter Cliffs — becomes a dead zone.

3. Emissions in the air – which the applicant ignores — threaten water quality. I am concerned about American Aquafarm’s effort to ignore the effect of its air emissions on water quality in the waters surrounding the pens. The application takes no account of the effect of nitrous and sulphur oxides emitted to the air by the daily operations of these pens and the boats tending them. These emissions will acidify the nearby waters, which, combined with the predictable diesel fuel spills from two 40,000 gallon tanks on-site, will threaten the delicate food chain. For example, in preparing these comments, I learned that lobster larvae live on or near the surface for four to six weeks after hatching. That (and the effect on shellfish of this air-borne but water-concentrated pollution) is simply ignored by the applicant.

4. The plan for handling solid waste is implausible. The applicant asserts that 90% of solid waste will be captured, but that assumes that the liquid is first removed from massive amounts of fecal material. And what happens to the liquid waste, with its bacterial and toxic contents intact? It is returned to the waters near the pens.The fact that the discharge pipes are located near the intake pipes shows that this potentially toxic effluent will concentrate rapidly and remain untreated.5. The applicant has been engaged in compliance theatre. The history of this project shows that American Aquafarms is involved in a kind of “compliance theatre:” offering carefully-massaged data based not on experience – because there has been no experience with this technology at this scale in this kind of an environment — but on hypothetical projections and vague assurances that, if a waste discharge or die-off problem arises in the future, they’ll monitor it and fix it. Self-serving submissions like that, without even a trace of triangulation from a range of independent experts, cannot remotely satisfy the applicant’s burden of proof. As one example, consider the fact that both diesel tanks are just 2000 gallons below the 42,000 gallon threshold defined as “reasonably expected to cause substantial harm in the event of a spill.” As a reason for not calculating the full environmental effects of granting the licenses, this is the kind of literalism that gives lawyers a bad name.It is similarly understandable that the applicant would divide a single coordinated project into two separate applications; indeed, all of the applicant’s discharge calculations address only a single site. But, as a concerned citizen, I have seen and am persuaded by hydrodynamic analyses showing the combined impact of flows moving between and concentrating at these two sites. With respect, a DEP truly concerned with protecting the environment in the real world need not be blinkered by this sharp, overly-clever practice.6. The need for a public hearing is pressing. Obviously, individual citizens like me may not have the scientific or technical expertise to mount a specific challenge in comments like these, but we can insist that the expert agencies in state government – including DEP — slow this train down and demand that the applicant’s assertions and data be tested fully and in a fully public hearing before granting the applications. The agency must not rely on “insufficient evidence” of harm to default to a finding of no significant adverse impact, especially given the massive amount of dead-zone-creating effluent that will be created.Every agency of state government is a trustee for Maine’s people and its environment, but that is especially true of DEP. Respectfully, I urge you to use your legal authority right now to assure that this unprecedented project is subject to the fullest and most transparent investigation, including assuring that no ex parte communications between the company and the state government are playing a role in this process; that an in-person public hearing be held now that covid restrictions are being lifted; that the give-and-take of a live session be encouraged, with cross-examination and testimony under oath, to include written expert submissions submitted in advance and made available to the public. Government in the sunshine requires a hearing and not just a meeting.

7. Conclusion. It would be arbitrary and capricious for DEP to grant a license on the basis of an application that is so selective in its environmental assessment.; indeed, the worst possible outcome from my perspective would be DEP’s rubber stamping of American Aquafarm’s obvious attempt to appropriate and privatize the public value of this unique place. And let’s be clear: we all know that politics should play no role in a legal proceeding, but we live in the real world, where approving a license that promises perhaps tens of jobs but threatens several industries employing thousands would be an utterly avoidable, self-inflicted wound on the DEP.Thank you.RS

10/27/21 Ellsworth American Bad apple spoils rally

Dear Editor: I was very disappointed to read the news report about a rally on Oct. 19 in Gouldsboro opposing the American Aquafarms salmon farm project for Prospect Harbor and Frenchman Bay. We met outside because breakthrough infections of COVID are so rampant on the Schoodic Peninsula. The Planning Board had had other meetings on the proposed moratorium ordinance and there was really nothing to add. We were told the meeting would be quick and uneventful, so we stayed outside.Suddenly a man walked into the parking lot of the Prospect Harbor Women’s Club, where more than 80 of us were standing, and started screaming and swearing. The rally had been very calm until that point. Yes, some people did shout back because they were frightened, outraged and incredulous. We reacted to a verbal assault. All of us were concerned about the young children present. Being a grandmother of young children, it was very upsetting. The police handled the matter beautifully and the man went into the building. That is what happened.

Colleen MacGregor Wallace South Gouldsboro

Becky Okeefe, Prospect Harbor

10/27/21 MD Islander letter Onward

To the Editor: We created the Somes Pond Center to help conserve and celebrate Somes Pond as a vibrant element in the greater commons of the Acadian archipelago. We love this land and water as a gift from nature where humans have found sustenance and serenity from time immemorial. In that spirit, we proudly join the widening community of organizations and individuals who oppose the proposed American Aquafarms salmon factory in Frenchman Bay.Opponents of the aquafactory have ably documented that it would foul our long conserved commons, damage our regional economy and degrade natural pleasures enjoyed by generations of residents and visitors. Bay vistas valued by millions would be violated. Technologies untested at the scale proposed risk pollution that would harm established family enterprises long adapted to our waters. Giant pumping diesels would drone day and night, spewing toxic fumes at a scale equivalent to 16,500 tractor-trailers idling annually among the Porcupines. Some 9,000 real trucks would rumble through Ellsworth down east and back every year hauling salmon and supplies. The proposed aqua-factory would corrupt a pristine bay that is beloved for a day, a week, a season or all year by many millions.Stress can make us stronger, and this industrial proposal has been galvanizing for our diverse and broad community. We salute leaders who have voiced early opposition to the proposed aquafactory, including Superintendent Kevin Schneider at Acadia National Park, which annually anchors a $511 million, 5,400 job contribution to our regional economy. We all wish to protect this foundation. Our common voice can move the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct the full Environmental Impact Statement that would aid the State of Maine in evolving regulatory oversight of aquaculture industries. The challenge of defeating the aqua-factory is uniting town leaders, lobstermen, summer residents, kelp-farmers, scientists and common citizens in a broad united front. The Somes Pond Center is honored to join their ranks.Onward!

Judy Goldstein Dennis Bracale Somes Pond Center board Hulls Cove

Ellsworth American 10/27/21

Dear Editor: This is my first letter to the editor of this paper. I am moved to write to correct what was, in my opinion, a misrepresentation in The Ellsworth American of what occurred at a community gathering in Gouldsboro on Tuesday, Oct. 19.A broad spectrum of citizens from our town came together to show opposition to a proposal to site two 60-acre salmon pens in Frenchman Bay and to use the former Maine Fair Trade lobster processing complex to hatch and process salmon and to handle sludge collected from the salmon pens.I was a participant in the gathering in front of the Prospect Harbor Women’s Club and what I experienced was a friendly gathering of local people, almost all familiar to me. There were fishermen, neighbors and families with children. We held signs, some homemade, and burst into impromptu chants accompanied by someone who had a small drum.About 10 minutes before the group disbanded, I was shocked to hear the proprietor of a local business in Winter Harbor yelling crude obscenities at the top of his lungs, directly in front of two young children. I was aghast and called to him that there were children present and asked him to watch his language. But he was enraged and kept right on cursing.Everyone has a right to their opinion, but no one has the right to behave as he did in public. I was grateful that our two Gouldsboro police officers were present, as I was afraid he might hurt someone; he was that angry.This outburst was never reported in the newspaper.Deirdre McArdle Gouldsboro

10/27/21 Ellsworth American

An uneven account

Dear Editor: I attended the Gouldsboro demonstration of concerned, knowledgeable and passionate local residents and wonder how your reporting of the event excluded the fact that Mr. Johnson, whose insulting comments, laced with uncivil language, instigated the confrontational tone that followed an otherwise peaceful gathering.His position, rooted solely in support of the Norwegian industrial company (with the misleading name “American Aquafarms”), included the words “Get your heads out of your [expletive],” and “Give them (the Norwegian company) a chance.” He never acknowledged the extraordinary harm that would be caused to Frenchman Bay or the risks posed by potential leaks and problems by adding tons of fish effluence (fish poop!) to the ocean. Nor did he acknowledge the risk of a disastrous pen die-out, allowing an international company to lease (ad infinitum) the pristine Maine waters adjacent to Acadia National Park (and ultimately set the precedent of selling out the entirety of the Maine coastline), the addition of noise, light and truck traffic to Gouldsboro, Acadia and its environs and the outrageous scope of this Norwegian proposal that would not even be allowed in Norway!Would the farming of 55 million pounds of salmon bring year-round local jobs as Mr. Johnson was focused on? I imagine it would. But at what cost? Your reporting never questions Mr. Johnson’s accusation that the demonstrators were having “an emotional response.” The three eloquent speakers at this demonstration (did you hear them?) gave factual information about the implied dangers of this dreaded proposal and presented photographs of the recent salmon pen die-out at the Black Island pen sites. They also encouraged the dozens of people gathered to get involved to prevent the selling-out of Frenchman Bay. Your reporting focused, instead, on the one inarticulate and ill-mannered attendee. Gouldsboro residents will have an opportunity on Nov. 15 to vote “yes” on a 180-day moratorium on the decision to allow the permit. This much-needed time will give the town an opportunity to toughen its laws in order to prevent this horror show from proceeding. I wish you had given attention to that in your article.

Judith Kampmann Birch Harbor

OP Ed by Henry Sharpe, Dec 20th, 2021, PPH


EA letter to Editor Dec 23, 2021

The numbers don’t lie

Dear Editor: In a letter from Frenchman Bay Conservancy, 22 conservation, economic and cultural organizations recently wrote Governor Janet Mills to demand an environmental review of American Aquafarms’ (AA) proposed salmon farm in Frenchman Bay.AA CEO Keith Decker dismissed several of the group’s concerns. Yet all the information in the detailed letter originated from AA’s own permit applications to the departments of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Marine Resources (DMR).Decker stated in the Dec. 9 article in The Ellsworth American that the 4 billion gallons of seawater to be pumped into the bay each day “is not a discharge, but instead is natural, clean water in which the fish thrive and grow.”This simply isn’t true. When discharged, it’s not seawater! AA’s own applications say this first discharge stream is a mix of urine, feces, ammonia, uneaten feed and, sometimes, antibiotics and pesticides. As just one example, the applications say 4,687 pounds of dissolved nitrogen (ammonia) is discharged daily. That’s more than 166,000 people produce, more nitrogen than Maine’s four largest cities combined produce daily — concentrating into a bay that does not flush! Nitrogen (think fertilizer) causes red tide, algal blooms, fish die-offs and eutrophication.A second 190,000-gallon daily discharge stream consists of foul liquid squeezed from captured excrement that’s just dumped into the ocean. The remaining solids will be taken to the company’s proposed shore facility in Prospect Harbor.Decker also says the letter’s figures for generator diesel fuel consumption are “grossly exaggerated” despite coming straight from the DMR applications. They say both lease sites have a 40,000-gallon tank, each refilled every 7 to 10 days. If 80,000 gallons is refilled every seven days, that’s 4.9 million gallons annually. If refilled every 10 days, that’s 2.9 million gallons annually.Burning that much diesel would release between 65 and 92 million pounds of CO2 into the air each year (using standard Department of Energy ratios). According to EIA data from the U.S. government, that’s equivalent to 3-4 percent of the CO2 produced in Maine for all electric power generation.The facts are there, right there in the company’s own permit applications.Henry Sharpe President, Frenchman Bay United

EA Dec 23,2021

letter to editor.

Frenchman Bay falsehoods

Dear Editor: I am a lifelong fisherman of Frenchman Bay. I have fished the bay for over 50 years. I am familiar with the huge tides and winds that frequently occur here. American Aquafarms wants to put a 120-acre salmon farm in Frenchman Bay. American Aquafarms CEO Keith Decker says the company’s proposed 30 salmon pens will not affect those of us who fish in the bay. That shows either how little he knows, or wants to know, about the bay. Hard to tell. Those salmon pens would need several huge moorings with extensive scope, which is the amount of rope you need for the moorings to hold all around those pens because of the volatile weather and tides.There is no way possible that lobster fishermen can fish anywhere near those moorings, like Decker said we would be able to. All of my life I have fished near The Hop site, and the boat traffic there is like a four-way intersection. American Aquafarms could not have picked a worse spot for us, and a better spot for them. Also, the loss of our gear will be tremendous when their 150-foot boat travels from Bald Rock to Prospect Harbor.The ocean is peppered with traps that whole distance. There is no way American Aquafarms could keep its service boat away from our gear. I drew lines on my chart from every harbor in the upper bay and going offshore, and every one of those lines hit part of the salmon pens on their way out and on their way back in. There is no way that this salmon farm would not greatly disrupt our existing fisheries, small-scale aquaculture and all of the longtime tourism and recreational use of Frenchman Bay. I want to protect this bay so that my grandchildren can earn their livelihood here the way that I have.Jerry Potter South Gouldsboro